HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Test Partnership · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Test Partnership

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Test Partnership was named 4 times in Candidate assessment, where TestGorilla led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market22 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Test Partnership for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	22 of 101	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Test Partnership yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Test Partnership across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If compliance and validity are top priorities, look at Test Partnership.” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Test Partnership (Best for Cognitive & Personality)” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative

“Test Partnership is a strong alternative” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Test Partnership, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Test Partnership was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla3 of 42Not in the top three

Criteria Corp2 of 41Not in the top three

SHL1 of 41Not in the top three

VidCruiter1 of 41Not in the top three

Greenhouse + integrations1 of 40Not in the top three

Harver1 of 40Not in the top three

HireVue1 of 40Not in the top three

The Predictive Index1 of 40Not in the top three

eSkill1 of 40Not in the top three

iMocha1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Test Partnership. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Test Partnership and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

assessmentday.co.uk3

testlify.com3

aihr.com2

criteriacorp.com2

getapp.com2

jobcannon.io2

pin.com2

recruiterslineup.com2

technologyadvice.com2

testgorilla.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Test Partnership came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

assessmentday.co.uk/resources/best-candidate-assessments-mid-sized.html3

aihr.com/blog/top-pre-employment-assessment-tools2

getapp.com/hr-employee-management-software/pre-employment-testing/org/mid-size-business2

jobcannon.io/compare/best-pre-employment-assessments2

pin.com/blog/pre-employment-assessment-tools2

recruiterslineup.com/best-pre-employment-assessment-companies2

technologyadvice.com/blog/human-resources/best-pre-employment-testing-software2

testlify.com/top-10-pre-hire-assessment-platforms-for-enterprises2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Test Partnership's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Test Partnership, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at testpartnership.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.