HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › TimeOff.Management · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

TimeOff.Management

6Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TimeOff.Management was named 2 times in Leave, where BambooHR led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business46 of 72

under the label threshold

Mid-market38 of 89

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 94

under the label threshold

In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TimeOff.Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	0%	38 of 89	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TimeOff.Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TimeOff.Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Leapsome, BambooHR (simple for SMBs), TimeOff.Management, or Rippling score well (4.5+ on G2/Capterra)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Leave · negative prompt · alternative

“Runner Up: TimeOff.Management offers paid plans starting around $1/user/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Leave · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TimeOff.Management, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeOff.Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LeaveBoard3 of 62Not in the top three

Rippling2 of 61Not in the top three

BambooHR2 of 60Not in the top three

Connecteam2 of 60Not in the top three

Vacation Tracker2 of 60Not in the top three

actiPLANS2 of 60Not in the top three

Jibble1 of 61Not in the top three

Simple Leave1 of 61Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now1 of 60Not in the top three

Day Off1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TimeOff.Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named TimeOff.Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

employsome.com5

timeoff.managementYour site5

forbes.com4

peoplemanagingpeople.com4

actiplans.com3

connecteam.com3

attendancebot.com2

capterra.com2

charliehr.com2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

Twenty-seven of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming TimeOff.Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

employsome.com/best/leave-management-software5

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-leave-management-systems4

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-leave-management-software4

timeoff.management/4

actiplans.com/blog/free-leave-management-software3

attendancebot.com/blog/8-best-leave-management-software-for-small-businesses-in-20262

charliehr.com/best-leave-management-systems2

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-leave-management-system2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TimeOff.Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TimeOff.Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at timeoff.management is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.