HR AI Index
Index Vendors › actiPLANS · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

actiPLANS

23Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Leave for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named actiPLANS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll2%8 of 890%8under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for actiPLANS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated actiPLANS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most budget-conscious small companies, actiPLANS or Connecteam tend to be the best balance of free/cheap pricing and genuinely useful features.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Leave · budget prompt · first choice
“Also mentioned as solid, budget-friendly options for smaller businesses” Mistral Small · Leave · budget prompt · alternative
“A free tier for tiny teams | actiPLANS” Perplexity Sonar · Leave · budget prompt · alternative
“actiPLANS (Solid Scalable Free Option)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Leave · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as actiPLANS, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and actiPLANS was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LeaveBoard21 of 236Not in the top three
Vacation Tracker18 of 234Not in the top three
Day Off18 of 231Not in the top three
Timetastic11 of 234Not in the top three
BambooHR11 of 231Not in the top three
Calamari8 of 230Not in the top three
Workday6 of 230Not in the top three
PlanMyLeave5 of 230Not in the top three
Rippling5 of 230Not in the top three
Connecteam4 of 231Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named actiPLANS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named actiPLANS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com22
employsome.com18
actiplans.comYour site14
peoplemanagingpeople.com14
technologyadvice.com10
charliehr.com9
attendancebot.com8
vacationtracker.io8
connecteam.com7
tracefyhr.com7

103 of the 117 domain citations in answers naming actiPLANS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when actiPLANS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as actiPLANS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at actiplans.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack