Every category where a model named Jibble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	6%	7 of 90	0%	12	accepted challenger
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	0%	33 of 89	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	21 of 95	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%
HRIS and HCM platforms	Core HR and payroll	0%	34 of 46	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22%
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	44 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jibble yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jibble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative14 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels11

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Jibble stands out because its free plan supports unlimited users and includes advanced features like AI facial recognition” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“Jibble is your best bet with unlimited users at no cost.” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“Jibble is the strongest free option” Perplexity Sonar · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“It offers enterprise-grade features (geo-tracking, photo clock-in) at a price point accessible to mid-market companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not a full HRIS; useful as a supplement.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jibble, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jibble was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam34 of 537Not in the top three

Homebase28 of 537Not in the top three

Clockify24 of 533Not in the top three

Deputy19 of 532Not in the top three

Buddy Punch15 of 532Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time15 of 530Not in the top three

When I Work15 of 530Not in the top three

Rippling11 of 530Not in the top three

UKG Pro10 of 535Not in the top three

BambooHR10 of 532Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jibble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 53 answers that named Jibble and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com26

peoplemanagingpeople.com25

jibble.ioYour site24

selectsoftwarereviews.com19

techrepublic.com15

apps365.com14

business.com14

timetrex.com14

joinhomebase.com13

connecteam.com12

152 of the 176 domain citations in answers naming Jibble came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software18

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software15

techrepublic.com/article/best-time-and-attendance-software15

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software14

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-time-and-attendance-software14

timetrex.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software-202414

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software12

trackingtime.co/time-attendance-software/best-time-attendance-software.html11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Jibble

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jibble; a claim can dispute any of them.

Clockify/Jibble 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jibble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jibble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jibble.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.