Every category where a model named Clockify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	12%	2 of 90	0%	22	accepted challenger
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	27 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Clockify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Clockify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labels2

Comparative18 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels8

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with a free solution like Open Time Clock or Clockify can provide professional features without upfront costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“For the tightest budget: Clockify (free, unlimited users) is the safest bet for most small companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“Clockify is the industry standard. The free version is incredibly generous and supports unlimited users.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“Clockify stands out as one of the best time and attendance systems due to its robust free plan” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Clockify, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clockify was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Homebase42 of 7213Not in the top three

Connecteam33 of 725Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time33 of 721Not in the top three

Toggl Track24 of 727Not in the top three

Jibble24 of 726Not in the top three

Deputy20 of 722Not in the top three

When I Work20 of 720Not in the top three

Buddy Punch17 of 721Not in the top three

TimeCamp16 of 720Not in the top three

Harvest15 of 726Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Clockify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 72 answers that named Clockify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com40

selectsoftwarereviews.com29

peoplemanagingpeople.com26

techrepublic.com26

business.com21

joinhomebase.com21

gartner.com20

timetrex.com19

connecteam.com17

trackingtime.co16

235 of the 235 domain citations in answers naming Clockify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software32

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software28

techrepublic.com/article/best-time-and-attendance-software26

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software21

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-tracking-software20

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-time-and-attendance-software19

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software18

timetrex.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software-202418

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Clockify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Clockify; a claim can dispute any of them.

Clockify / Toggl 1Clockify/Jibble 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Clockify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Clockify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clockify.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.