Every category where a model named TimeCamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	6%	8 of 90	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TimeCamp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TimeCamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained17 labels5

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a cloud-based solution that offers a free or low-cost plan, such as TimeCamp, Connecteam, or Homebase” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“TimeCamp or Clockify offer the best balance of features and price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“TimeCamp (if you need advanced features like invoicing)” MiniMax M2.5 · Time and attendance · budget prompt · first choice

“Small businesses wanting affordable paid time tracking | Starts at $2.99 per user/month” Perplexity Sonar · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TimeCamp, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TimeCamp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Homebase20 of 224Not in the top three

Clockify16 of 224Not in the top three

Connecteam15 of 224Not in the top three

Jibble7 of 223Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time7 of 220Not in the top three

Deputy6 of 221Not in the top three

Buddy Punch6 of 220Not in the top three

When I Work5 of 220Not in the top three

ClockShark3 of 220Not in the top three

Harvest3 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TimeCamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named TimeCamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com20

techrepublic.com18

peoplemanagingpeople.com12

business.com11

selectsoftwarereviews.com11

fitsmallbusiness.com10

timetrex.com8

joinhomebase.com7

techradar.com7

gartner.com6

110 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming TimeCamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software20

techrepublic.com/article/best-time-and-attendance-software17

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-time-and-attendance-software12

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software11

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software11

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-time-and-attendance-software9

timetrex.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software-20248

techradar.com/best/best-time-and-attendance-systems7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TimeCamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TimeCamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at timecamp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.