Every category where a model named Harvest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	2%	13 of 90	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Harvest yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Harvest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels7

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Harvest: Best Overall for Client-Facing Billability & Invoicing... Harvest is the gold standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“A favorite for smaller-to-mid agencies looking to bridge the gap between simple time tracking and actual billing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · alternative

“Harvest is worth the premium for its seamless invoicing workflow” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“The Best for Invoicing & Sales: Harvest” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Harvest, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Harvest was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Toggl Track15 of 234Not in the top three

Clockify15 of 233Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time14 of 230Not in the top three

Hubstaff7 of 230Not in the top three

Connecteam6 of 231Not in the top three

Gusto5 of 231Not in the top three

Homebase5 of 231Not in the top three

Rippling4 of 231Not in the top three

Jibble3 of 231Not in the top three

When I Work3 of 231Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Harvest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 23 answers that named Harvest and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com12

toggl.com8

business.com7

myhours.com7

novo.co7

selectsoftwarereviews.com7

g2.com6

capterra.com5

chronoid.app5

desklog.io5

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Harvest came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-tracking-software9

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-time-tracking-apps7

myhours.com/best-time-tracking-software-small-business7

novo.co/software/time-tracking7

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software7

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software6

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software6

desklog.io/blog/best-time-tracking-softwares5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Harvest

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Harvest; a claim can dispute any of them.

Harvest (Professional Edition) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Harvest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Harvest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at harvest.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.