Every category where a model named Toggl Track for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	10%	5 of 90	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Toggl Track yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Toggl Track across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase19 labels8

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best All-Rounder: Toggl Track ... Toggl Track is the industry leader for a reason.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Toggl Track as the top choice for employee time tracking software” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd pick Toggl Track first” GPT-5.4 mini · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“My Top Recommendation: Toggl Track” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Toggl Track, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Track was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Clockify24 of 324Not in the top three

Harvest15 of 326Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time15 of 322Not in the top three

Hubstaff13 of 320Not in the top three

Connecteam6 of 321Not in the top three

Homebase6 of 321Not in the top three

Jibble5 of 322Not in the top three

Rippling4 of 322Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now4 of 321Not in the top three

Deputy4 of 321Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Toggl Track. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 32 answers that named Toggl Track and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com16

toggl.comYour site14

myhours.com10

capterra.com9

thedigitalprojectmanager.com9

learn.g2.com8

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

selectsoftwarereviews.com8

clockify.me7

g2.com7

Eighty-two of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Toggl Track came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-tracking-software14

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-time-tracking-apps9

myhours.com/best-time-tracking-software-small-business9

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software8

learn.g2.com/best-time-tracking-software8

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software8

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/enterprise-time-tracking-software7

desklog.io/blog/best-time-tracking-softwares6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Toggl Track

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Toggl Track; a claim can dispute any of them.

Clockify / Toggl 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Toggl Track's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Toggl Track, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at toggl.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.