HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › UKG Pro Succession Planning · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

UKG Pro Succession Planning

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UKG Pro Succession Planning was named 3 times in Succession planning, where Lattice led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market33 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 92

under the label threshold

In succession planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UKG Pro Succession Planning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	0%	33 of 99	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UKG Pro Succession Planning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UKG Pro Succession Planning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid‑market needing repeatable, role‑linked succession pipelines with clear readiness evidence” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative

“The strongest fit for mid-market enterprises that need repeatable succession pipelines” Llama 4 Maverick · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UKG Pro Succession Planning, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UKG Pro Succession Planning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentGuard4 of 50Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand3 of 50Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors3 of 50Not in the top three

Engagedly2 of 52Not in the top three

Dayforce2 of 51Not in the top three

Lattice2 of 51Not in the top three

SuccessionStack2 of 51Not in the top three

Workday Succession Planning2 of 51Not in the top three

ChartHop2 of 50Not in the top three

PeopleFluent2 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UKG Pro Succession Planning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named UKG Pro Succession Planning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

engagedly.com5

talentguard.com5

worldmetrics.org5

firsthr.app4

guideflow.com4

gartner.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

darwinbox.com2

monday.com2

skillpanel.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming UKG Pro Succession Planning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

engagedly.com/blog/best-succession-planning-softwares5

talentguard.com/blog/10-best-role-readiness-planning-software-for-20255

worldmetrics.org/best/succession-planning-software5

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software4

guideflow.com/blog/succession-planning-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/succession-planning-technology3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-succession-planning-software3

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-succession-planning-software-enterprises2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UKG Pro Succession Planning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UKG Pro Succession Planning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ukg.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.