Index › Products › Veriato Vision · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Veriato Vision

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Veriato Vision was named 3 times in Employee monitoring, where ActivTrak led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market24 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise37 of 73

under the label threshold

In employee monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Veriato Vision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee monitoring	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	24 of 75	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Veriato Vision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Veriato Vision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Teramind / Veriato Vision / Work Examiner if the primary need is security, compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need deep security monitoring → Teramind or Veriato Vision” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Veriato Vision, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veriato Vision was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Insightful4 of 42Not among the top eight

ActivTrak4 of 41Not among the top eight

Hubstaff4 of 41Not among the top eight

Teramind4 of 40Not among the top eight

DeskTime3 of 40Not among the top eight

Time Doctor3 of 40Not among the top eight

WorkTime3 of 40Not among the top eight

CurrentWare2 of 40Not among the top eight

KeepActive2 of 40Not among the top eight

RescueTime2 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veriato Vision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Veriato Vision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

insightful.io4

employee-monitoring.net3

currentware.com2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

forbes.com2

learn.g2.com2

pcmag.com2

teramind.co2

traqq.com2

capterra.com1

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Veriato Vision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

insightful.io/blog/top-10-employee-monitoring-software4

employee-monitoring.net/blog/employee-monitoring-comparison-matrix3

currentware.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software2

fitsmallbusiness.com/employee-monitoring-software2

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-monitoring-software2

insightful.io/blog/employee-activity-monitoring-tools-compared2

learn.g2.com/best-employee-monitoring-software2

pcmag.com/picks/the-best-employee-monitoring-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

veriato.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veriato Vision takes 0% of first choices and ActivTrak takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 485 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 123 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,949
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $43 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

19 ads · 15 text, 3 image, 1 video · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as Awareness Technologies Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 75 in employee monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ActivTrak

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on veriato.com

481

subdomains included

Content

381

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

5 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	217	1	2026-09-21
Webinar or virtual event	73	undated
Report or ebook	53	0	2026-02-18
Case study	17	undated
Glossary or explainer	10	0	2020-07-31
News or press	10	0	2026-03-25
Comparison	1	1	2026-08-20

Most recent

2026-09-21Employee investigations digital evidence blog
2026-08-20Ueba vs uba whats the difference comparison
2026-07-06Sentiment analysis insider risk signals blog
2026-06-02Ethical ai insider risk platforms blog
2026-04-14Behavioral visibility blog
2026-03-25Veriato 2026 cybersecurity excellence awards news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page veriato.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Veriato Vision

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veriato Vision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veriato Vision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veriato Vision by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Veriato Vision is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veriato Vision, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.