HR AI Index

Index › Products › WorkTime · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

WorkTime

22Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

11 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WorkTime was named 9 times in Employee monitoring, where ActivTrak led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business27 of 75

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 73

under the label threshold

In employee monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WorkTime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee monitoring	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	10 of 75	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by ActivTrak at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkTime yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkTime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Opt for "privacy-first" options like WorkTime (no screenshots, attendance-focused)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · first choice

“WorkTime (markets itself specifically as "non-invasive")” Kimi K2 · Employee monitoring · negative prompt · first choice

“Best low-cost all-around pick: WorkTime” GPT-6 Luna · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · first choice

“Offers a free tier or trial, but primarily starts at ~$6.99–$10.99/user/month after” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkTime, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkTime was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hubstaff17 of 222Not among the top eight

Teramind17 of 222Not among the top eight

ActivTrak15 of 224Not among the top eight

DeskTime12 of 221Not among the top eight

Insightful12 of 221Not among the top eight

CurrentWare10 of 220Not among the top eight

Time Doctor9 of 220Not among the top eight

Controlio7 of 220Not among the top eight

Apploye4 of 221Not among the top eight

Toggl Track4 of 221Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkTime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named WorkTime and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com15

worktime.comYour site14

employee-monitoring.net13

forbes.com13

insightful.io13

guideflow.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

teramind.co9

fitsmallbusiness.com8

learn.g2.com7

Ninety-six of the 110 domain citations in answers naming WorkTime came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-employee-monitoring-software13

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-monitoring-software13

guideflow.com/blog/employee-monitoring-software9

fitsmallbusiness.com/employee-monitoring-software8

learn.g2.com/best-employee-monitoring-software7

business.com/categories/employee-monitoring-software6

insightful.io/blog/employee-activity-monitoring-tools-compared6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-monitoring-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

worktime.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, WorkTime takes 2% of first choices and ActivTrak takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee monitoring tools”

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“worktime”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 17 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 13,333 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,196 · 215 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,740
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 75 in employee monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ActivTrak

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on worktime.com

1,912

subdomains included

Content

277

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	191	3	2026-09-30	Employee monitoring, Time and attendance
Case study	32	0	2026-01-05	Employee monitoring
News or press	28	1	2026-08-27	Employee monitoring
Comparison	19	3	2026-09-02	Employee monitoring
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2024-05-29	Employee monitoring
Conference or event	1	0	2017-02-02
Report or ebook	1	0	2020-06-20	Employee monitoring
Template or tool	1	0	2020-06-18	Employee monitoring

Most recent

2026-09-30DeskTime review (2026): features, pricing, pros and cons blog
2026-09-30Employee monitoring blog
2026-09-18Statistics blog
2026-09-02Best controlio alternatives compared comparison
2026-08-27Worktime new release news or press
2026-07-22Teramind vs veriato comparison comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page worktime.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow WorkTime

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

WorkTime is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: #1 Non-Invasive Employee Monitoring Software; employee monitoring software that helps analyze team performance, reduce distractions, and drive real results.
worktime.com
For: business owners, managers, human resources (HR), call centers, outsource agencies
worktime.com
Price stated: Basic $6.99 / employee / month billed monthly; Premium $8.99 / employee / month billed monthly; Enterprise $10.99 / employee / month billed monthly worktime.com
Starting price: 6.99 worktime.com
Free plan or trial: Try 14 days free; No credit card required. worktime.com
Certifications: HIPAA safeGDPR safeHIPAA compliantGDPR compatibleSOC 2 complianceGLBA complianceHIPAA complianceGDPR compliance
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting, customers

What WorkTime's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: worktime.com, worktime.com/pricing, worktime.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkTime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkTime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkTime by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where WorkTime is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkTime, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.