HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Vetty · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Vetty

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Vetty was named 4 times in Background screening, where Checkr led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market14 of 59

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 49

under the label threshold

In background screening · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vetty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Background screening	Talent acquisition	0%	14 of 59	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Checkr at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vetty yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vetty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Vetty unifies background screening, onboarding, and continuous post-hire monitoring in a single platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Background screening · comparative prompt · alternative

“Vetty distinguishes itself by focusing heavily on continuous monitoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vetty, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vetty was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Checkr6 of 72Not in the top three

First Advantage5 of 72Not in the top three

Accurate Background4 of 70Not in the top three

HireRight4 of 70Not in the top three

GoodHire3 of 70Not in the top three

HireShield3 of 70Not in the top three

Certn2 of 70Not in the top three

Mitratech AssureHire2 of 70Not in the top three

Sterling2 of 70Not in the top three

Verified First2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vetty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 7 answers that named Vetty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vetty.coYour site5

bib.com3

checkr.com3

mitratech.com3

expertinsights.com2

fadv.com2

aijourn.com1

bestrecruitingtools.com1

disa.com1

goodhire.com1

Seventeen of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Vetty came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

vetty.co/blog/best-background-check-companies-for-employers-in-2026-complete-comparison-gu4

bib.com/blog/best-background-screening-companies-comparison3

checkr.com/resources/articles/best-background-checks3

mitratech.com/resource-hub/blog/top-2026-background-check-vendors3

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-background-check-solutions2

fadv.com/article/background-check-providers2

aijourn.com/best-enterprise-background-screening-services-in-2026-options-built-for-compli1

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-background-check-software-enterprise-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vetty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vetty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vetty.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.