AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Whispli · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Whispli

57Judge labels
9First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Whistleblowing for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Whispli →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In whistleblowing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Whispli for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigationsCore HR and payroll8%4 of 1070%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Whispli yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Whispli across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels3
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative13 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained13 labels2
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if you want a single default recommendation, I'd lean Whispli for mid-market B2B” GPT-5.4 mini · Whistleblowing · direct prompt · first choice
“Whispli is the most commonly cited best-fit for mid-market teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · Whistleblowing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest all-around choice is usually Whispli” Perplexity Sonar · Whistleblowing · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Overall Pick: Whispli” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Whistleblowing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Whispli, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whispli was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SpeakUp20 of 573Not among the top eight
EQS Integrity Line14 of 570Not among the top eight
EthicsPoint11 of 572Not among the top eight
Ethico11 of 570Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whispli. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 57 answers that named Whispli and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

navex.com35
faceup.com33
ordio.com32
g2.com26
whistlelink.com25
guideflow.com22
whispli.comYour site22
speakup.com21
gartner.com20
elker.com18

232 of the 254 domain citations in answers naming Whispli came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

whispli.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Whispli takes 8% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“whispli”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
22 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 119 a month
Searches its site ranks for
131 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,702
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 107 in whistleblowing
Segment leader
25%
FaceUp
First choices
9 across its categories
Named in
57 answers
Its own site cited
in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on whispli.com
552
subdomains included
Content
258
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog188452026-09-29
Webinar or virtual event4102026-06-16
Case study13undated
Report or ebook13undated
Glossary or explainer202026-06-16
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page whispli.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Whispli

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Whispli is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise Case Management, Whistleblowing and Disclosures
For
organisations; global teams; compliance and HR teams
Price stated
Starting prices for a 3-year contract. Annualised payment. Any applicable taxes are not included. whispli.com/pricing
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IISOC2 Type 2ISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliantSOC 2 Type II compliantISO 45001
Hosting
Europethe USthe UKthe UAEAustraliaAsiaEUNorth America
Customers named
WelthungerhilfeWHHglobal NGO WHHVeoliaDecathlonAuchan RetailServierBPCE
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Whispli's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: whispli.com, whispli.com/pricing, whispli.com/compliance, whispli.com/use-case/health-safety, whispli.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whispli's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whispli, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whispli by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Whispli is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whispli, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at whispli.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.