Every category where a model named Workday People Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	77 of 99	43%	21	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday People Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday People Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	1	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	2	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative21 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Embedded analytics inside the Workday ecosystem, with enterprise-grade predictive capabilities.” Perplexity Sonar · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

“best if you already run Workday and want analytics tightly embedded in an HCM suite” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

“There is zero data migration, data-cleaning, or external API integration required.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if you already use Workday: Workday Analytics/People Analytics” GPT-5.4 mini · People analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Facing multiple U.S. lawsuits ... alleging AI-driven job screening discriminates” Grok 4.1 Fast · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Workday People Analytics if you need advanced analytics.” Mistral Small · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Be very cautious with "Enterprise giants" that sell analytics as an add-on... Avoid if you're under ~2,000 employees.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

“native HCM analytics modules (such as Workday People Analytics or SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday People Analytics, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday People Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visier66 of 7033Not in the top three

One Model39 of 704Not in the top three

ChartHop34 of 705Not in the top three

Crunchr29 of 701Not in the top three

Culture Amp21 of 701Not in the top three

BambooHR18 of 707Not in the top three

Lattice15 of 702Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors15 of 700Not in the top three

Eletive13 of 701Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics13 of 701Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday People Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 70 answers that named Workday People Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrbench.com38

eletive.com37

thrivesparrow.com36

workhuman.com33

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com25

peoplemanagingpeople.com25

hr.university23

agile-hr-analytics.com20

adp.com17

firsthr.app16

270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Workday People Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrbench.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software38

eletive.com/blog/people-analytics-tools37

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software35

workhuman.com/blog/people-analytics-software33

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-hr-analytics-tools-for-enterprises/1338835725

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-people-analytics-software24

hr.university/tools/hr-analytics-software23

adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/p/people-analytics-pitfalls.aspx16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday People Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday People Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday People Analytics / Prism 1Workday People Analytics / Workday Peakon 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday People Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday People Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.