Index › Products › Workplace Wealth · October 2026 Edition

Workplace · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Workplace Wealth

6Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workplace Wealth was named 3 times in Financial wellness, where LearnLux led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 117

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 69

under the label threshold

In financial wellness · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workplace Wealth for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Financial wellness platforms	Compensation and total rewards	0%	40 of 117	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workplace Wealth yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workplace Wealth across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workplace Wealth, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workplace Wealth was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Banzai4 of 60Not among the top eight

LearnLux4 of 60Not among the top eight

Financial Finesse3 of 60Not among the top eight

Origin3 of 60Not among the top eight

BrightPlan2 of 61Not among the top eight

FinFit2 of 60Not among the top eight

Nudge Global2 of 60Not among the top eight

Questis2 of 60Not among the top eight

SmartDollar2 of 60Not among the top eight

Tapcheck2 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workplace Wealth. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Workplace Wealth and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com6

wifitalents.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

myshortlister.com4

compensationtools.net3

dataintelo.com3

gitnux.org3

gminsights.com3

itechguides.com3

rewordin.com3

Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Workplace Wealth came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/financial-wellness-software6

wifitalents.com/best/financial-wellness-software6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-financial-wellness-software5

compensationtools.net/best-financial-wellness-software3

dataintelo.com/report/financial-wellness-platform-market3

gitnux.org/service/financial-wellbeing3

gminsights.com/industry-analysis/financial-wellness-software-market3

itechguides.com/best/financial-wellness-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

workplaceprivacyreport.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Workplace Wealth takes 0% of first choices and LearnLux takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “financial wellness platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “financial wellness platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Its company's site: workplaceprivacyreport.com shared with Workplace's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 192 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 400 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 873
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 40 of 117 in financial wellness

Segment leader

24%

LearnLux

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 6 answers
Its own site cited: in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Workplace Wealth

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Workplace is the company behind Workplace Wealth.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Workplace: Workplace from Meta

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workplace Wealth's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workplace Wealth, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workplace Wealth by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Workplace Wealth is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workplace Wealth, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.