HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Workplace from Meta · September 2026 Edition

Workplace · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Workplace from Meta

22Judge labels

0First choices

15Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Workplace from Meta was named 9 times in Internal communications and 1 other category, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business75 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market79 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise73 of 73

under the label threshold

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Workplace from Meta for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	79 of 80	75%	8	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	49 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workplace from Meta yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workplace from Meta across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“privacy concerns tied to Meta's ecosystem, inconsistent search/mobile, and declining support post-acquisition/shutdown rumors” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“If Workplace from Meta was on your shortlist, remove it, as Meta has decommissioned the platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Workplace by Meta - mentioned as being shut down and advised to migrate to Workvivo.” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid (Discontinued / End-of-Life) ... If you're considering them, don't” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workplace from Meta, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workplace from Meta was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint14 of 220Not in the top three

Simpplr11 of 222Not in the top three

Workvivo10 of 223Not in the top three

LumApps8 of 221Not in the top three

Staffbase8 of 221Not in the top three

Unily8 of 221Not in the top three

Slack8 of 220Not in the top three

Jive7 of 220Not in the top three

Microsoft Viva Engage5 of 220Not in the top three

Microsoft Teams4 of 222Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workplace from Meta. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 22 answers that named Workplace from Meta and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workvivo.com9

agilityportal.io8

mangoapps.com8

simpplr.com8

reddit.com7

g2.com6

axerosolutions.com5

oak.com5

concretecms.com4

elcom.com.au4

Sixty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Workplace from Meta came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms8

reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1kmkcf5/looking_for_intranet_platforms_that_dont_require6

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms6

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared4

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-20244

oak.com/blog/why-most-sharepoint-intranets-fail-employees-how-to-fix-it4

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison4

concretecms.com/about/blog/intranets/workplace-by-meta-shutdown-alternatives3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workplace from Meta

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workplace from Meta; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workplace by Meta 4Workplace 1Workplace by Meta / Facebook Workplace 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workplace from Meta's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workplace from Meta, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workplace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.