HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Jive · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Jive

13Judge labels

0First choices

10Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jive was named 7 times in Internal communications, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business74 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market80 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise60 of 73

under the label threshold

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	80 of 80	86%	7	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jive yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms like Jive (owned by Aurea) once set the standard ... shift into "maintenance mode."... buying into a legacy platform will leave your team with a clunky tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“notably lower average rating (3.9/5) compared to others, with users reporting issues such as poor search functionality and a less intuitive user interface” Mistral Small · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“Outdated interface, crowded homepage, unintuitive navigation, poor mobile experience, lack of recent development, slow support” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

“Jive: Plan a migration to a more modern, user-friendly platform with better mobile support and governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal communications · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jive, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jive was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft SharePoint12 of 132Not in the top three

Simpplr7 of 131Not in the top three

Unily7 of 130Not in the top three

Workplace from Meta7 of 130Not in the top three

Staffbase6 of 130Not in the top three

Happeo5 of 131Not in the top three

LumApps5 of 130Not in the top three

Workvivo4 of 131Not in the top three

Microsoft Viva Engage4 of 130Not in the top three

Slack4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 13 answers that named Jive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workvivo.com8

mangoapps.com6

oak.com6

simpplr.com6

axerosolutions.com5

g2.com5

agilityportal.io4

lumapps.com4

omniaintranet.com4

reddit.com4

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Jive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/best-platforms8

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms6

workvivo.com/modern-intranet/platforms-comparison6

axerosolutions.com/blog/best-intranet-software-platforms-compared5

g2.com/products/jive/reviews4

oak.com/blog/why-most-sharepoint-intranets-fail-employees-how-to-fix-it4

reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/1kmkcf5/looking_for_intranet_platforms_that_dont_require4

firsthr.app/compare/general/company-intranet-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jive.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.