| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 88 of 88 | 83% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 133 of 162 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ZoomInfo, 6sense, and Demandbase are priced for enterprise and typically require dedicated ops resources that mid-market companies don't have.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Skills intelligence · direct prompt · soft negative
“Why to be cautious: Built primarily for sales intelligence, not recruiting... complain about outdated or inaccurate contact data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not as recruiter-focused as others, which can limit its effectiveness for talent sourcing.” Mistral Small · Recruiting CRM · comparative prompt · soft negative
“strong database but consistently scores below competitors on lead quality and accuracy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named ZoomInfo and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoominfo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.