Time and attendance · October 2026 Edition
Connecteam vs Toggl Track
One of fourteen models named Connecteam first on the direct prompt; zero named Toggl Track. Connecteam was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Toggl Track by ten and Connecteam carries 21 labels and Toggl Track 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nineteen categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share8%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2113A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Connecteam reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Paylocity was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Clockify vs Connecteam · Clockify vs Toggl Track · Paylocity vs Connecteam
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time and attendance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ConnecteamFirst choices, of fourteen modelsToggl Track
Direct10
Paraphrase14
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Connecteam and Toggl Track stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Connecteam Toggl Track first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Connecteam on the left and Toggl Track on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Connecteam and Toggl Track stood in it.
Connecteam first, Toggl Track not the choice
1 of 14 modelsToggl Track was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GLM 4.7 FlashXConnecteam, Paylocity alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Buddy Punch, Paycom, QuickBooks Time
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Kimi K2Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, Deputy, Paylocity, UKG Ready
Muse Glimmer 30BADP Workforce Now alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Calamari, Connecteam, UKG Pro / UKG Ready
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Factorial alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Jibble, Paylocity, Synerion
GPT-5.4 miniADP Workforce Now, UKG Ready alternatives: Paylocity, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Everhour, Harvest, Jibble, TCP Software, TimeClock Plus
Perplexity SonarPaylocity alternatives: Factorial, Paycor, QuickBooks Time, UKG Ready
Grok 4.1 FastPaylocity, UKG Ready alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Buddy Punch, QuickBooks Time
Mistral SmallADP Workforce Now alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Paycor
DeepSeek V4 FlashUKG Ready alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Paycom, QuickBooks Time
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: BambooHR Time Tracking, Humanity Time, Paycor
Qwen 3.7 FlashPaylocity alternatives: Deputy, Replicon, UKG Pro
MiniMax M2.5ADP Workforce Now, Paylocity alternatives: Rippling, TimeCamp, UKG Pro
GPT-6 LunaUKG Ready alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Deputy, Paylocity
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Connecteam leads by four points.
Connecteam6%#5 of 12Toggl Track2%#8 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Connecteam8%#6 of 15Toggl Track8%#7 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Connecteam0%#12 of 13Toggl Track0%#– of 13What the models said about Connecteam
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about Toggl Track
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Toggl Track is widely considered the most user-friendly tool on the market... Toggl Track is the easiest overlay tool to integrate.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Toggl Track - a strong choice for mid-sized companies, especially professional services firms with 50-250 employees.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Toggl Track as the primary choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Clockify vs ConnecteamClockify vs Toggl TrackPaylocity vs ConnecteamPaylocity vs Toggl TrackADP Workforce Now vs ConnecteamADP Workforce Now vs Toggl TrackJibble vs ConnecteamJibble vs Toggl TrackHomebase vs ConnecteamHomebase vs Toggl TrackConnecteam vs UKG ReadyToggl Track vs UKG ReadyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full time and attendance standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.