AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Giving & volunteering › Selflessly vs Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Employee giving and volunteering · October 2026 Edition

Selflessly vs Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform

One of fourteen models named Selflessly first on the direct prompt; one named Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform. Selflessly was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform by fourteen and Selflessly carries 30 labels and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform 61, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Selflessly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share20%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%59%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3061A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Selflessly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Uncommon Giving was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Millie vs Selflessly · Millie vs Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform · Selflessly vs Uncommon Giving

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SelflesslyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Direct118 against Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Paraphrase318 against Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Comparative012
Budget-constrained701 against Selflessly · 6 against Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Scale-constrained103 against Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Negative0011 against Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Selflessly and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform were named in the same answer fifty-four times, of the 89 answers naming Selflessly and the 180 naming Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform. In those answers Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform took the first choice six times and Selflessly twenty-seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Selflessly and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Selflessly Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Selflessly on the left and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Selflessly and Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform stood in it.

Selflessly first, Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform an alternative

1 of 14 modelsBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaSelflessly alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Millie, YourCause

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform first, Selflessly not the choice

1 of 14 modelsSelflessly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Social Cues alternatives: Goodchange, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniBonterra alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Grok 4.1 FastMillie alternatives: Goodera, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
DeepSeek V4 FlashGroundswell, Millie alternatives: Bright Funds, OnHand, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Uncommon Giving alternatives: Bright Funds, Groundswell, Millie
Gemini 3.5 FlashGroundswell alternatives: Bright Funds, Deed, Millie, Uncommon Giving
Perplexity SonarMillie alternatives: Percent Pledge, Uncommon Giving
Mistral SmallBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving, VolunteerLocal
Llama 4 MaverickBright Funds alternatives: Guideflow, Uncommon Giving
Kimi K2Groundswell, Millie alternatives: Alaya, OnHand, YourCause
GLM 4.7 FlashXBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving
MiniMax M2.5Bright Funds, Uncommon Giving alternatives: Millie, OnHand
Muse Glimmer 30BBright Funds, Uncommon Giving

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Selflessly leads by forty-three points.
Selflessly43%#1 of 11
Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Selflessly leads by seventeen points.
Selflessly20%#2 of 10
Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform3%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform leads at enterprise.
Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform69%#1 of 11
Selflessly2%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Selflessly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“add giving but exceed tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Selflessly is probably your sweet spot — it's the most affordable all-in-one solution built specifically for small and medium businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in the results is Selflessly because it is explicitly described as an affordable solution” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Tilt (formerly Tilt Studio) or Selflessly, depending on your specific focus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms with documented, repeated criticisms Benevity ... complex admin, slow fund distribution, 2–3% transaction fees, hard-to-reach support, and low employee engagement.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Legacy CSR platforms with slow payouts, limited payment options, or clunky workflows; Benevity, YourCause, and Deed are specifically called out for issues” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Benevity, YourCause, CyberGrants that charge extra for support, have high transaction fees, and require complex onboarding” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“It's one of the most comprehensive "all-in-one" CSR platforms, with strong global disbursement, nonprofit vetting, mobile access, and enterprise reporting.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Benevity if you need the most comprehensive platform, have complex global needs, and budget isn't a primary constraint” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Benevity is described as the reference for employee-led programmes — giving, matching and volunteering at global scale” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.