AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Giving & volunteering › Selflessly vs YourCause
Employee giving and volunteering · October 2026 Edition

Selflessly vs YourCause

One of fourteen models named Selflessly first on the direct prompt; zero named YourCause. Selflessly was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and YourCause by fourteen and Selflessly carries 30 labels and YourCause 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Selflessly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

YourCause

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share20%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%50%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3034A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Selflessly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Uncommon Giving was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Millie vs Selflessly · Millie vs YourCause · Selflessly vs Uncommon Giving

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SelflesslyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsYourCause
Direct102 against YourCause
Paraphrase321 against YourCause
Comparative00
Budget-constrained701 against Selflessly · 4 against YourCause
Scale-constrained101 against YourCause
Negative009 against YourCause
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Selflessly and YourCause were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 89 answers naming Selflessly and the 99 naming YourCause. In those answers YourCause took the first choice zero times and Selflessly eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Selflessly and YourCause stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Selflessly YourCause first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Selflessly on the left and YourCause on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Selflessly and YourCause stood in it.

Selflessly first, YourCause an alternative

1 of 14 modelsYourCause was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaSelflessly alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Millie, YourCause

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastMillie alternatives: Goodera, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
DeepSeek V4 FlashGroundswell, Millie alternatives: Bright Funds, OnHand, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
Kimi K2Groundswell, Millie alternatives: Alaya, OnHand, YourCause

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Uncommon Giving alternatives: Bright Funds, Groundswell, Millie
GPT-5.4 miniBonterra alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Gemini 3.5 FlashGroundswell alternatives: Bright Funds, Deed, Millie, Uncommon Giving
Perplexity SonarMillie alternatives: Percent Pledge, Uncommon Giving
Mistral SmallBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving, VolunteerLocal
Llama 4 MaverickBright Funds alternatives: Guideflow, Uncommon Giving
Qwen 3.7 FlashBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Social Cues alternatives: Goodchange, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud
GLM 4.7 FlashXBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving
MiniMax M2.5Bright Funds, Uncommon Giving alternatives: Millie, OnHand
Muse Glimmer 30BBright Funds, Uncommon Giving

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Selflessly leads by forty-three points.
Selflessly43%#1 of 11
YourCause0%#10 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Selflessly leads by seventeen points.
Selflessly20%#2 of 10
YourCause3%#6 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: YourCause leads at enterprise.
YourCause6%#3 of 11
Selflessly2%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Selflessly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“add giving but exceed tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Selflessly is probably your sweet spot — it's the most affordable all-in-one solution built specifically for small and medium businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in the results is Selflessly because it is explicitly described as an affordable solution” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Tilt (formerly Tilt Studio) or Selflessly, depending on your specific focus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about YourCause

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Benevity, YourCause, and Deed are specifically called out for issues such as long distribution timelines, limited mobile support, or heavy administrative burden” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Benevity, YourCause, CyberGrants that charge extra for support, have high transaction fees, and require complex onboarding” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-heavy platforms like Benevity or YourCause unless you have 1,000+ employees” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“YourCause is a SaaS-based platform ... This is ideal for mid-sized companies that want a comprehensive platform without enterprise complexity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend considering YourCause (from Blackbaud) or Millie as top choices for a mid-sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“YourCause is a strong competitor to Benevity, particularly for organizations already using Blackbaud's fundraising software.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.