AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Onboarding and employee experience › Giving & volunteering › Selflessly vs Uncommon Giving
Employee giving and volunteering · October 2026 Edition

Selflessly vs Uncommon Giving

One of fourteen models named Selflessly first on the direct prompt; three named Uncommon Giving. Selflessly was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Uncommon Giving by thirteen and Selflessly carries 30 labels and Uncommon Giving 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Selflessly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Uncommon Giving

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share20%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3032A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Selflessly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Millie was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Millie vs Selflessly · Millie vs Uncommon Giving · Selflessly vs Bright Funds

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the employee giving and volunteering page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SelflesslyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUncommon Giving
Direct13
Paraphrase30
Comparative00
Budget-constrained711 against Selflessly · 2 against Uncommon Giving
Scale-constrained12
Negative02
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Selflessly and Uncommon Giving were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 89 answers naming Selflessly and the 80 naming Uncommon Giving. In those answers Uncommon Giving took the first choice eight times and Selflessly fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Selflessly and Uncommon Giving stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Selflessly Uncommon Giving first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Selflessly on the left and Uncommon Giving on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Selflessly and Uncommon Giving stood in it.

Selflessly first, Uncommon Giving not the choice

1 of 14 modelsUncommon Giving was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaSelflessly alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Millie, YourCause

Uncommon Giving first, Selflessly not the choice

3 of 14 modelsSelflessly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Uncommon Giving alternatives: Bright Funds, Groundswell, Millie
MiniMax M2.5Bright Funds, Uncommon Giving alternatives: Millie, OnHand
Muse Glimmer 30BBright Funds, Uncommon Giving

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGroundswell alternatives: Bright Funds, Deed, Millie, Uncommon Giving
Perplexity SonarMillie alternatives: Percent Pledge, Uncommon Giving
Grok 4.1 FastMillie alternatives: Goodera, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
Mistral SmallBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving, VolunteerLocal
DeepSeek V4 FlashGroundswell, Millie alternatives: Bright Funds, OnHand, Selflessly, Uncommon Giving
Llama 4 MaverickBright Funds alternatives: Guideflow, Uncommon Giving
GLM 4.7 FlashXBright Funds alternatives: Uncommon Giving

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniBonterra alternatives: Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform
Qwen 3.7 FlashBenevity Enterprise Impact Platform, Social Cues alternatives: Goodchange, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud
Kimi K2Groundswell, Millie alternatives: Alaya, OnHand, YourCause

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Selflessly leads by thirty-five points.
Selflessly43%#1 of 11
Uncommon Giving7%#3 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Selflessly leads by ten points.
Selflessly20%#2 of 10
Uncommon Giving10%#3 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Uncommon Giving leads at enterprise.
Uncommon Giving12%#2 of 11
Selflessly2%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Selflessly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“add giving but exceed tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Selflessly is probably your sweet spot — it's the most affordable all-in-one solution built specifically for small and medium businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in the results is Selflessly because it is explicitly described as an affordable solution” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Tilt (formerly Tilt Studio) or Selflessly, depending on your specific focus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Uncommon Giving

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Starts at ~$5,000/year, which is steep for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Full-suite options (e.g., Uncommon Giving at $5,000/year min) are better for larger firms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“look into modern, employee-experience-first platforms such as Deed, Groundswell, Uncommon Giving, or Millie” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for streamlined mid-market giving: Uncommon Giving, pairing giving wallets with volunteer management.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Best value to shortlist: Uncommon Giving—if your software budget is around $5,000/year or more” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.