Every category where a model named Uncommon Giving for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	10%	3 of 70	6%	32	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uncommon Giving yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uncommon Giving across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	3	0	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	0	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels4

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative15 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels8

Scale-constrained11 labels4

Negative11 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look into modern, employee-experience-first platforms such as Deed, Groundswell, Uncommon Giving, or Millie” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Giving & volunteering · negative prompt · first choice

“Best for streamlined mid-market giving: Uncommon Giving, pairing giving wallets with volunteer management.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Giving & volunteering · direct prompt · first choice

“Best value to shortlist: Uncommon Giving—if your software budget is around $5,000/year or more” GPT-6 Luna · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · first choice

“praised for simple onboarding (live in 48 hours), transparent pricing, and better responsiveness” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Starts at ~$5,000/year, which is steep for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · hard negative

“Full-suite options (e.g., Uncommon Giving at $5,000/year min) are better for larger firms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uncommon Giving, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uncommon Giving was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform58 of 809Compare →

Selflessly47 of 8015Compare →

Millie39 of 8013Compare →

YourCause36 of 800Compare →

Groundswell31 of 803Compare →

POINT23 of 803Not among the top eight

Goodera18 of 800Not among the top eight

Bright Funds16 of 804Compare →

Percent Pledge15 of 800Not among the top eight

Chezuba12 of 800Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uncommon Giving. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 80 answers that named Uncommon Giving and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uncommongiving.comYour site73

bonterratech.com48

g2.com45

guideflow.com41

yourcause.com37

stratuslive.com36

goodera.com27

benevity.com26

worldmetrics.org25

sourceforge.net22

307 of the 380 domain citations in answers naming Uncommon Giving came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software53

stratuslive.com/blog/7-best-workplace-giving-platforms36

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-software31

bonterratech.com/blog/charitable-giving-software28

bonterratech.com/blog/corporate-giving-platforms27

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-giving-software25

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/corporate-volunteering-platform24

worldmetrics.org/best/employee-volunteering-software20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

uncommongiving.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Uncommon Giving takes 10% of first choices and Millie takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“uncommon giving”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 64 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,272 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,245 · 10 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 679
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

10%

rank 3 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 16 across its categories
Named in: 80 answers
Its own site cited: in 80 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on uncommongiving.com

196

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

8 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Glossary or explainer	5	0	2023-01-16
Blog	4	0	2026-03-04
Case study	4	0	2024-05-13
Webinar or virtual event	2	0	2024-10-18
Comparison	2	2	2026-09-09
News or press	2	1	2026-10-01
Report or ebook	1	0	2023-05-01
Template or tool	1	0	2026-02-27
Podcast or video	1	0	2025-04-22

Most recent

2026-10-01Uncommon giving launches grants management news or press
2026-09-09Submittable alternatives comparison
2026-09-09Benevity vs yourcause comparison
2026-03-04Csr impact report builder blog
2026-02-27Roi calculator template or tool
2026-02-26Uncommon giving csr resources hub blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page uncommongiving.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Uncommon Giving

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Uncommon Giving; a claim can dispute any of them.

Uncommon Giving (uncommongiving.com) 1

Follow Uncommon Giving

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Uncommon Giving is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: CSR Software to Empower Employees & Unlock More Generosity
uncommongiving.com
For: Businesses
uncommongiving.com
Price stated: Pricing that Fits Your Company uncommongiving.com
Starting price: $2,400 per year uncommongiving.com/features/pricing
Integrations claimed: 3 uncommongiving.com
Customers named: BloomerangChick-fil-A franchiseOmaticVibe Credit UnionPaycor
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Uncommon Giving's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: uncommongiving.com, uncommongiving.com/features/pricing, uncommongiving.com/case-studies, uncommongiving.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uncommon Giving's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uncommon Giving, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uncommon Giving by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Uncommon Giving is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Uncommon Giving, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Uncommon Giving is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Uncommon Giving is among the products AI models recommend first in Employee giving and volunteering this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-giving-and-volunteering/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/uncommon-giving--employee-giving-and-volunteering-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee giving and volunteering, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee giving and volunteering standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-giving-and-volunteering/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/uncommon-giving--employee-giving-and-volunteering-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee giving and volunteering, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee giving and volunteering standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://hr-ai-index.com/experience/employee-giving-and-volunteering/"><img src="https://hr-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/uncommon-giving--employee-giving-and-volunteering-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Employee giving and volunteering, October 2026 Edition, HR AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Employee giving and volunteering standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.