Every category where a model named Chezuba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	23 of 70	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chezuba yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chezuba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Companies emphasizing skills-based volunteering and international collaboration.” Mistral Small · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

“Other options include Chezuba, which provides comprehensive real-time impact reports” Llama 4 Maverick · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · alternative

“Chezuba often appears in comparisons as the "volunteering-first" platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

“Skills-based/pro-bono volunteer programs: → Chezuba” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chezuba, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chezuba was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform21 of 278Not among the top eight

POINT14 of 272Not among the top eight

Selflessly13 of 273Not among the top eight

Uncommon Giving12 of 275Not among the top eight

YourCause11 of 271Not among the top eight

Goodera11 of 270Not among the top eight

Millie10 of 270Not among the top eight

Groundswell9 of 271Not among the top eight

OnHand7 of 270Not among the top eight

Percent Pledge6 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chezuba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Chezuba and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uncommongiving.com23

g2.com21

guideflow.com17

yourcause.com17

bonterratech.com16

worldmetrics.org15

goodera.com12

benevity.com11

gitnux.org11

submittable.com11

No domain is on file for Chezuba, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software22

goodera.com/en-gb/blog/corporate-volunteering-software10

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-software10

submittable.com/blog/best-csr-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/employee-volunteering-software10

yourcause.com/articles/best-corporate-volunteering-software10

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-giving-software9

momogood.com/blog/best-employee-giving-platforms9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Chezuba stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“chezuba”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Chezuba

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chezuba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chezuba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chezuba by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Chezuba is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chezuba, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.