Every category where a model named OnHand for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	24 of 70	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OnHand yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OnHand across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Mid-market companies needing governed volunteering workflows with impact analytics” Kimi K2 · Giving & volunteering · direct prompt · alternative

“3. OnHand ⭐ *Best for Sustainability Focus*” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“onHand (Best for Sustainability & Eco-Actions)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for employee engagement/gamification” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OnHand, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OnHand was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform16 of 232Not among the top eight

Millie14 of 238Not among the top eight

Selflessly14 of 233Not among the top eight

Uncommon Giving12 of 233Not among the top eight

Goodera9 of 230Not among the top eight

POINT8 of 230Not among the top eight

Chezuba7 of 230Not among the top eight

Percent Pledge7 of 230Not among the top eight

YourCause7 of 230Not among the top eight

Double the Donation5 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OnHand. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named OnHand and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com18

uncommongiving.com18

bonterratech.com14

stratuslive.com14

yourcause.com14

guideflow.com13

goodera.com9

momogood.com9

worldmetrics.org9

zipdo.co9

No domain is on file for OnHand, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software15

stratuslive.com/blog/7-best-workplace-giving-platforms14

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-software10

bonterratech.com/blog/corporate-giving-platforms9

momogood.com/blog/best-employee-giving-platforms9

bonterratech.com/blog/charitable-giving-software8

worldmetrics.org/best/employee-volunteering-software8

givebutter.com/blog/workplace-giving7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where OnHand stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“onhand”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 54 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as OnHand

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OnHand; a claim can dispute any of them.

onHand 7

Follow OnHand

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OnHand's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OnHand, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OnHand by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OnHand is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OnHand, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.