Every category where a model named POINT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	3%	6 of 70	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for POINT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated POINT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels5

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend POINT (if you can start free and primarily focus on volunteering) or Selflessly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · first choice

“POINT stands out as the best option for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · first choice

“a free volunteer‑management tool like POINT plus a simple payroll deduction or credit‑card program works well” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for: Teams wanting a cost-effective, straightforward solution for volunteer tracking.” Mistral Small · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some (e.g., volunteer-only like early Goodera or POINT) lack integrated giving/matching” Grok 4.1 Fast · Giving & volunteering · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as POINT, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and POINT was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Selflessly24 of 319Not among the top eight

Uncommon Giving23 of 316Not among the top eight

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform20 of 312Not among the top eight

Millie16 of 315Not among the top eight

Chezuba14 of 310Not among the top eight

YourCause14 of 310Not among the top eight

Goodera9 of 310Not among the top eight

Groundswell8 of 311Not among the top eight

OnHand8 of 310Not among the top eight

Percent Pledge7 of 310Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named POINT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named POINT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uncommongiving.com30

bonterratech.com23

g2.com19

stratuslive.com18

yourcause.com17

worldmetrics.org15

pointapp.orgYour site12

selflessly.io12

guideflow.com11

slashdot.org11

156 of the 168 domain citations in answers naming POINT came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software28

stratuslive.com/blog/7-best-workplace-giving-platforms18

bonterratech.com/blog/corporate-giving-platforms14

worldmetrics.org/best/employee-volunteering-software12

bonterratech.com/blog/charitable-giving-software11

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/corporate-volunteering-platform11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-csr-software10

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/benevity-competitors10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pointapp.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, POINT takes 3% of first choices and Millie takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“point”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,649,805 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 45,011 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,168 · 118 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,574
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on pointapp.org

467

subdomains included

Content

210

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	171	2	2026-08-21	Succession planning
Conference or event	21	undated
News or press	14	undated
Comparison	4	0	2026-04-14

Most recent

2026-08-21Point authorized use policy blog
2026-08-21Ai features terms of use blog
2026-05-28Were a top 25 nonprofit tool of 2026 blog
2026-04-14Compare features comparison
2024-05-014 benefits of corporate partnerships for nonprofits blog
2024-04-26Nonprofit collaboration community partnerships blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

October 1, 2026 to April 30, 2027Be an EXP Workplace Tour Host!Barstow High School, US · hosted
October 1, 2026 to April 30, 2027Be an EXP Guest Speaker!Barstow High School, US · hybrid · hosted

As the event pages on pointapp.org state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pointapp.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as POINT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as POINT; a claim can dispute any of them.

POINT (pointapp.org) 1

Follow POINT

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

POINT is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The most powerful free volunteer management platform for nonprofits. Find and manage volunteers with our volunteer app + website integration.
pointapp.org
For: nonprofits
pointapp.org
Price stated: Free, Pro, or Teams pointapp.org
Starting price: 0 pointapp.org/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start with a 14-day trial; No credit card required; Free pointapp.org
Certifications: SOC 2
Customers named: Special OlympicsThe Salvation ArmyAlzheimers AssociationAmerican Red CrossThe YMCAUnited WayMeals on WheelsAustin Diaper Bank
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What POINT's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pointapp.org, pointapp.org/pricing, trust.pointapp.org. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when POINT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as POINT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for POINT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where POINT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name POINT, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.