AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › FeedbackPulse vs 15Five
360 feedback · October 2026 Edition

FeedbackPulse vs 15Five

Zero of fourteen models named FeedbackPulse first on the direct prompt; zero named 15Five. FeedbackPulse was named by eight of the fourteen models and 15Five by thirteen and FeedbackPulse carries 12 labels and 15Five 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FeedbackPulse

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

15Five

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1235A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FeedbackPulse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Leapsome was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs FeedbackPulse · Lattice vs 15Five · Effy AI vs FeedbackPulse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FeedbackPulseFirst choices, of fourteen models15Five
Direct00
Paraphrase12
Comparative00
Budget-constrained201 against 15Five
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against 15Five
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FeedbackPulse and 15Five stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FeedbackPulse 15Five first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FeedbackPulse on the left and 15Five on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FeedbackPulse and 15Five stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
Llama 4 MaverickLeapsome alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Trakstar
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Engagedly, Leapsome
GLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, Spidergap alternatives: 15Five, Effy AI, Engagedly, Leapsome
MiniMax M2.5Lattice, Leapsome alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniPerformYard alternatives: Fast Mirror
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarLeapsome alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice
Mistral SmallLattice alternatives: Bonusly, Leapsome
GPT-6 LunaLeapsome alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
Muse Glimmer 30BLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FeedbackPulse leads by four points.
FeedbackPulse5%#5 of 14
15Five2%#9 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
FeedbackPulse leads by two points.
FeedbackPulse6%#6 of 14
15Five4%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FeedbackPulse leads by two points.
FeedbackPulse2%#– of 11
15Five0%#11 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FeedbackPulse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Start with Effy AI (free up to 5 users) or FeedbackPulse (free up to 10 users) to test the process with no upfront cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best 360-degree feedback tool is usually FeedbackPulse if you need a truly low-cost option for a small team” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about 15Five

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Reported limitations: Managers can't do group check-ins... Limited engagement survey customization” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“$11 per user per month, billed annually, which can be expensive if 360s are all you need” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.