AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › 360 feedback › FeedbackPulse vs PerformYard
360 feedback · October 2026 Edition

FeedbackPulse vs PerformYard

Zero of fourteen models named FeedbackPulse first on the direct prompt; one named PerformYard. FeedbackPulse was named by eight of the fourteen models and PerformYard by twelve and FeedbackPulse carries 12 labels and PerformYard 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FeedbackPulse

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

PerformYard

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1220A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FeedbackPulse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Leapsome was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs FeedbackPulse · Lattice vs PerformYard · Effy AI vs FeedbackPulse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the 360 feedback page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FeedbackPulseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPerformYard
Direct01
Paraphrase11
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FeedbackPulse and PerformYard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FeedbackPulse PerformYard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FeedbackPulse on the left and PerformYard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FeedbackPulse and PerformYard stood in it.

PerformYard first, FeedbackPulse not the choice

1 of 14 modelsFeedbackPulse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPerformYard alternatives: Fast Mirror

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard, Teamflect
Grok 4.1 FastLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
DeepSeek V4 FlashLattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PerformYard
Qwen 3.7 FlashLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, FeedbackPulse, Leapsome

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Leapsome, Spidergap
Perplexity SonarLeapsome alternatives: Culture Amp, EchoSpan, Lattice
Mistral SmallLattice alternatives: Bonusly, Leapsome
Llama 4 MaverickLeapsome alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Trakstar
Kimi K2Lattice alternatives: 15Five, Engagedly, Leapsome
GLM 4.7 FlashXLattice, Spidergap alternatives: 15Five, Effy AI, Engagedly, Leapsome
MiniMax M2.5Lattice, Leapsome alternatives: 15Five, Culture Amp, Spidergap
GPT-6 LunaLeapsome alternatives: Culture Amp, Lattice
Muse Glimmer 30BLattice alternatives: Culture Amp, Leapsome

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FeedbackPulse leads by five points.
FeedbackPulse5%#5 of 14
PerformYard0%#– of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
FeedbackPulse leads by two points.
FeedbackPulse6%#6 of 14
PerformYard4%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FeedbackPulse leads by two points.
FeedbackPulse2%#– of 11
PerformYard0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FeedbackPulse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Start with Effy AI (free up to 5 users) or FeedbackPulse (free up to 10 users) to test the process with no upfront cost.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best 360-degree feedback tool is usually FeedbackPulse if you need a truly low-cost option for a small team” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about PerformYard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“I'd start with PerformYard because it tends to be the least complicated path to a clean 360 process.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“my default pick is PerformYard” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.