Engagedly vs Gloat
Zero of twelve models named Engagedly first on the direct prompt; two named Gloat. Engagedly was named by six of the twelve models and Gloat by eleven and Engagedly carries 10 labels and Gloat 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal talent marketplace page.
By framing
EngagedlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsGloat
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Engagedly Gloat first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Engagedly on the left and Gloat on the right.The direct prompt
Gloat first, Engagedly not the choice
2 of 12 modelsEngagedly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Engagedly9%#3 of 12Gloat9%#4 of 12What the models said about Engagedly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Gloat
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Gloat & Eightfold: Unless you have more than 2,000 employees... these enterprise solutions can result in low adoption and high implementation fatigue.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“avoid these for now. They are expensive to purchase and require substantial, ongoing internal resources to manage effectively.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure enterprises like Gloat/Eightfold: High cost, complex setup, data-hungry AI underperforms at mid-scale.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Gloat is a leading *internal mobility* platform, especially for enterprise workforce agility and project matching.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall for mid‑market B2B: Fuel50 ... or Gloat (mature gig/project marketplace)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“If your priority is unlocking internal mobility → Gloat (pure-play) or suite-native options.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.