Engagedly vs TalentGuard
Zero of twelve models named Engagedly first on the direct prompt; one named TalentGuard. Engagedly was named by six of the twelve models and TalentGuard by seven and Engagedly carries 10 labels and TalentGuard 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the internal talent marketplace page.
By framing
EngagedlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsTalentGuard
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Engagedly and TalentGuard were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 63 answers naming Engagedly and the 116 naming TalentGuard. In those answers TalentGuard took the first choice three times and Engagedly nine.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Engagedly TalentGuard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Engagedly on the left and TalentGuard on the right.The direct prompt
TalentGuard first, Engagedly not the choice
1 of 12 modelsEngagedly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
TalentGuard24%#1 of 8Engagedly2%#– of 8Engagedly9%#3 of 12TalentGuard4%#5 of 12TalentGuard2%#– of 9Engagedly0%#– of 9What the models said about Engagedly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“I'd recommend Engagedly or TalentGuard as top internal mobility platforms, with Engagedly edging out as the primary pick” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about TalentGuard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“but "free" claims seem limited/trial-only; good for skills focus if you can budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.