Succession planning · September 2026 Edition
Engagedly vs Teamflect
Eight of twelve models named Engagedly first on the direct prompt; zero named Teamflect. Engagedly was named by ten of the twelve models and Teamflect by six and Engagedly carries 14 labels and Teamflect 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
First-choice share17%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Engagedly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Lattice vs Engagedly · Lattice vs Teamflect · Engagedly vs Empxtrack
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EngagedlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsTeamflect
Direct80
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Engagedly and Teamflect stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Engagedly Teamflect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Engagedly on the left and Teamflect on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Engagedly and Teamflect stood in it.
Engagedly first, Teamflect not the choice
8 of 12 modelsTeamflect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Engagedly, Lattice alternatives: ChartHop, ELMO Software, Fuel50, TalentGuard
Grok 4.1 FastEngagedly alternatives: Lattice, SuccessionNow, SuccessionStack
Mistral SmallEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: SuccessionNow, SuccessionStack, TalentGuard
DeepSeek V4 FlashEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: Leapsome, Paylocity, SuccessionNow, SuccessionStack
Llama 4 MaverickEngagedly alternatives: Lattice, SuccessionStack, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashEngagedly alternatives: Lattice, SuccessionStack, SuccessionWizard, TalentGuard
GLM 4.7 FlashXDayforce, Engagedly, Lattice, SuccessionStack alternatives: Cornerstone OnDemand, Leapsome, SAP SuccessFactors, SuccessionNow, TalentGuard, UKG Pro Succession Planning, Workday HCM
MiniMax M2.5Engagedly alternatives: Lattice, TalentGuard, UKG Pro
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice alternatives: ChartHop, OrgChart, PerformYard, SuccessionNow, Teamflect
Perplexity SonarTalentGuard alternatives: Engagedly
Kimi K2SuccessionStack alternatives: ClearCompany, Engagedly, Lattice, Paylocity
Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniUKG Pro alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Quantum Workplace, SAP SuccessFactors HCM
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamflect leads by four points.
Teamflect4%#6 of 9Engagedly0%#– of 9Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Engagedly leads at mid-market.
Engagedly17%#2 of 13Teamflect6%#4 of 13Enterprise
Teamflect is not named for this buyer.
Engagedly0%#– of 11Teamflect—not namedWhat the models said about Engagedly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“For most mid‑market B2B companies, Engagedly, Lattice, Dayforce, or SuccessionStack strike the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are the strongest starting points due to their integrated platforms and AI-driven features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Engagedly and Lattice are recommended for mid-market organizations for succession embedded in performance workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Teamflect
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“If you have fewer than 10 employees: Use Teamflect’s free plan (or download a free Excel template) + Creately for visual mapping. This costs you $0.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget, I'd suggest starting with Creately or Teamflect since they have free tiers.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Lattice vs EngagedlyLattice vs TeamflectEngagedly vs EmpxtrackEngagedly vs SuccessionNowEngagedly vs TalentGuardEngagedly vs SuccessionStackEmpxtrack vs TeamflectTeamflect vs SuccessionNowTeamflect vs TalentGuardTeamflect vs SuccessionStackAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full succession planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.