AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Performance and talent management › Succession planning › Lattice vs Leapsome
Succession planning · October 2026 Edition

Lattice vs Leapsome

Three of fourteen models named Lattice first on the direct prompt; zero named Leapsome. Lattice was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Leapsome by nine and Lattice carries 36 labels and Leapsome 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Lattice

accepted challenger

Named in nineteen categories this edition.

Leapsome

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

First-choice share28%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3616A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lattice reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Engagedly was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Engagedly · Lattice vs SuccessionNow · Lattice vs Teamflect

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LatticeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLeapsome
Direct30
Paraphrase112
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Lattice · 1 against Leapsome
Scale-constrained20
Negative002 against Lattice · 2 against Leapsome
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Lattice and Leapsome were named in the same answer 232 times, of the 712 answers naming Lattice and the 309 naming Leapsome. In those answers Leapsome took the first choice eighteen times and Lattice fifty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lattice and Leapsome stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Lattice Leapsome first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lattice on the left and Leapsome on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lattice and Leapsome stood in it.

Lattice first, Leapsome not the choice

3 of 14 modelsLeapsome was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Mistral SmallEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession Planning
MiniMax M2.5Lattice alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Deel HR, Qooper, TalentGuard Succession Planning

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Peoplebox alternatives: ChartHop, Engagedly, Lattice
Gemini 3.5 FlashSuccessionStack alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, PerformYard, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Grok 4.1 FastEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYard, SuccessionNow
GLM 4.7 FlashXEngagedly alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, Lattice, PeopleFluent Succession Management, SuccessionNow, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BBambooHR, Engagedly alternatives: Lattice, Paylocity, SuccessionHR, UKG Pro Succession Planning

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: BambooHR add-ons / partner ecosystem, ClearCompany, Cornerstone Talent Management / Talent Experience, UKG Pro Succession Planning, Workday Succession Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashSuccessionHR alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Galaxy, PeopleFluent Succession Management
Llama 4 MaverickSuccessionHR alternatives: Cornerstone, Engagedly
Qwen 3.7 FlashEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Kimi K2BambooHR, HiBob alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Fuel50
GPT-6 Luna15Five alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Lattice leads by five points.
Lattice9%#5 of 11
Leapsome4%#9 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Lattice leads by twenty-five points.
Lattice28%#1 of 13
Leapsome4%#7 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Lattice0%#10 of 10
Leapsome0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Lattice

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Lattice - A people management platform... best for mid-market and enterprise HR teams managing performance, goals, engagement, and compensation in one place.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Leapsome

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Lattice and Leapsome reach succession through performance tiers carrying $4,000 and $6,000 annual minimums.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.