Succession planning · October 2026 Edition
SuccessionNow vs Leapsome
Zero of fourteen models named SuccessionNow first on the direct prompt; zero named Leapsome. SuccessionNow was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Leapsome by nine and SuccessionNow carries 19 labels and Leapsome 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in twelve categories this edition.
First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%19%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1916A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SuccessionNow reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lattice was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs SuccessionNow · Lattice vs Leapsome · Engagedly vs SuccessionNow
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SuccessionNowFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLeapsome
Direct00
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained601 against Leapsome
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against SuccessionNow · 2 against Leapsome
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SuccessionNow and Leapsome stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
SuccessionNow Leapsome first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SuccessionNow on the left and Leapsome on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SuccessionNow and Leapsome stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.1 FastEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYard, SuccessionNow
Mistral SmallEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession Planning
GLM 4.7 FlashXEngagedly alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, Lattice, PeopleFluent Succession Management, SuccessionNow, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Peoplebox alternatives: ChartHop, Engagedly, Lattice
GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: BambooHR add-ons / partner ecosystem, ClearCompany, Cornerstone Talent Management / Talent Experience, UKG Pro Succession Planning, Workday Succession Planning
Gemini 3.5 FlashSuccessionStack alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, PerformYard, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Perplexity SonarEngagedly, Lattice alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Succession Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashSuccessionHR alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Galaxy, PeopleFluent Succession Management
Llama 4 MaverickSuccessionHR alternatives: Cornerstone, Engagedly
Qwen 3.7 FlashEngagedly alternatives: BambooHR, Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Kimi K2BambooHR, HiBob alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Fuel50
MiniMax M2.5Lattice alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Deel HR, Qooper, TalentGuard Succession Planning
GPT-6 Luna15Five alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BBambooHR, Engagedly alternatives: Lattice, Paylocity, SuccessionHR, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SuccessionNow leads by twelve points.
SuccessionNow16%#2 of 11Leapsome4%#9 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
SuccessionNow leads by seven points.
SuccessionNow11%#3 of 13Leapsome4%#7 of 13Enterprise
SuccessionNow leads by two points.
SuccessionNow2%#– of 10Leapsome0%#– of 10What the models said about SuccessionNow
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Others (like SuccessionNow) have published prices but may still be out of reach for very small teams.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best paid option to investigate: SuccessionNow. Third-party software listings show a flat price of about $2,995 per year” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have $3,000+/year: SuccessionNow — flat-rate, dedicated tool, no headcount penalties.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a dedicated succession tool, SuccessionNow is the best value at $2,995/year.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Leapsome
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Lattice and Leapsome reach succession through performance tiers carrying $4,000 and $6,000 annual minimums.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
Also compared
Lattice vs SuccessionNowLattice vs LeapsomeEngagedly vs SuccessionNowEngagedly vs LeapsomeSuccessionNow vs TeamflectSuccessionNow vs BambooHRSuccessionNow vs PerformYardSuccessionNow vs Workday Succession PlanningTeamflect vs LeapsomeBambooHR vs LeapsomePerformYard vs LeapsomeLeapsome vs Workday Succession PlanningAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full succession planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.