Comprehensive vs CompUp
Two of fourteen models named Comprehensive first on the direct prompt; two named CompUp. Comprehensive was named by eight of the fourteen models and CompUp by eight and Comprehensive carries 16 labels and CompUp 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation management page.
By framing
ComprehensiveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCompUp
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Comprehensive CompUp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Comprehensive on the left and CompUp on the right.The direct prompt
Comprehensive first, CompUp not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCompUp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.CompUp first, Comprehensive not the choice
2 of 14 modelsComprehensive was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Comprehensive4%#6 of 16CompUp4%#– of 16Comprehensive9%#3 of 13CompUp9%#4 of 13What the models said about Comprehensive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Prioritize platforms like Comprehensive, Figures.hr, Salary.com CompAnalyst, Paycom, or Ravio, which are frequently recommended for this size” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Start with Comprehensive if you want an all-in-one platform for salary planning, equity management, and compensation reviews” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend evaluating Compport and Comprehensive first since both are specifically positioned for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about CompUp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“CompUp appears particularly well-suited for mid-market and enterprise organizations running complex, multi-country compensation cycles.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.