CompUp vs CaptivateIQ
Two of fourteen models named CompUp first on the direct prompt; three named CaptivateIQ. CompUp was named by eight of the fourteen models and CaptivateIQ by eleven and CompUp carries 14 labels and CaptivateIQ 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compensation management page.
By framing
CompUpFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCaptivateIQ
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
CompUp CaptivateIQ first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CompUp on the left and CaptivateIQ on the right.The direct prompt
CompUp first, CaptivateIQ an alternative
2 of 14 modelsCaptivateIQ was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.CaptivateIQ first, CompUp not the choice
3 of 14 modelsCompUp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
CompUp2%#– of 15CaptivateIQ2%#9 of 15What the models said about CompUp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“CompUp appears particularly well-suited for mid-market and enterprise organizations running complex, multi-country compensation cycles.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about CaptivateIQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“most commission tools (like Spiff or CaptivateIQ) are prohibitively expensive for tight budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“CaptivateIQ is built for finance/comp admins who think in spreadsheets and need to model plan changes before rollout” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“CaptivateIQ (Best for Complex Plan Logic) ... The "industry standard" for mid-market to enterprise B2B teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“CaptivateIQ is my best default pick for a mid-market team” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.