HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition AI recruiting assistants › Ashby vs Greenhouse
AI recruiting assistants · September 2026 Edition

Ashby vs Greenhouse

Two of twelve models named Ashby first on the direct prompt; two named Greenhouse. Ashby was named by ten of the twelve models and Greenhouse by ten and Ashby carries 14 labels and Greenhouse 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Ashby

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Greenhouse

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

First-choice share7%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1416A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Ashby reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workable was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. GoPerfect vs Ashby · GoPerfect vs Greenhouse · Workable vs Ashby

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI recruiting assistants page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AshbyFirst choices, of twelve modelsGreenhouse
Direct222 against Ashby · 1 against Greenhouse
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Ashby · 1 against Greenhouse
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Ashby and Greenhouse were named in the same answer ninety-three times, of the 136 answers naming Ashby and the 370 naming Greenhouse. In those answers Greenhouse took the first choice twenty-four times and Ashby six.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Ashby and Greenhouse stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Ashby Greenhouse first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ashby on the left and Greenhouse on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Ashby and Greenhouse stood in it.

Ashby first, Greenhouse an alternative

2 of 12 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby alternatives: Findem, Humanly, Juicebox
Mistral SmallAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, TheHireHub.AI, hireEZ

Greenhouse first, Ashby an alternative

2 of 12 modelsAshby was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Gem, SmartRecruiters, Workable, hireEZ
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: GoPerfect, Lever, Workable

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastWorkable alternatives: Ashby, hireEZ
Qwen 3.7 FlashGem alternatives: Ashby, Autonomy Recruit, Greenhouse, TheHireHub.AI
GLM 4.7 FlashXTheHireHub.AI alternatives: Ashby, Autonomy Recruit, Greenhouse, Workable
MiniMax M2.5TheHireHub.AI alternatives: Ashby, Lever, Workable

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5GoPerfect alternatives: Juicebox, Workable
GPT-5.4 miniSeekOut alternatives: Paradox
Perplexity SonarGoPerfect alternatives: Autonomy Recruit, Workable
Llama 4 MaverickAutonomy Recruit alternatives: Humanly, Lever, TheHireHub.AI

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Ashby0%#– of 9
Greenhouse0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Ashby leads by two points.
Ashby7%#4 of 13
Greenhouse5%#5 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Greenhouse leads at enterprise.
Greenhouse8%#4 of 10
Ashby0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Ashby

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Potentially Greenhouse, Lever (by Employ), Ashby (FCRA investigations for AI screening/interviews)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Has a learning curve; avoid if your team wants simplicity” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“less "AI recruiter" and more ATS/workflow platforms” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Ideal for startups and mid-market companies needing a unified system for ATS, CRM, scheduling, and analytics.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Ashby if you need a full ATS replacement, or Spark Hire if you already have an ATS” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Greenhouse

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.