GoPerfect vs Ashby
Two of twelve models named GoPerfect first on the direct prompt; two named Ashby. GoPerfect was named by eight of the twelve models and Ashby by ten and GoPerfect carries 11 labels and Ashby 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI recruiting assistants page.
By framing
GoPerfectFirst choices, of twelve modelsAshby
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
GoPerfect Ashby first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GoPerfect on the left and Ashby on the right.The direct prompt
GoPerfect first, Ashby not the choice
2 of 12 modelsAshby was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Ashby first, GoPerfect not the choice
2 of 12 modelsGoPerfect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about GoPerfect
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“GoPerfect ranks first because it is the only platform that covers sourcing, screening, and outreach autonomously in a single agent” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“GoPerfect offers per-position pricing ($250/month per open role) that aligns costs with actual hiring activity” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (Pay-Per-Use): GoPerfect ... widely considered the most efficient choice for startups.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ashby
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Potentially Greenhouse, Lever (by Employ), Ashby (FCRA investigations for AI screening/interviews)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Has a learning curve; avoid if your team wants simplicity” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“less "AI recruiter" and more ATS/workflow platforms” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Ideal for startups and mid-market companies needing a unified system for ATS, CRM, scheduling, and analytics.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Ashby if you need a full ATS replacement, or Spark Hire if you already have an ATS” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.