Every category where a model named GoPerfect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	19%	1 of 84	0%	11	accepted challenger
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	2%	10 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	38 of 88	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GoPerfect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GoPerfect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase6 labels6

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels7

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“GoPerfect and Ashby are the most balanced choices, offering AI-powered hiring and internal talent mobility in a single platform” Mistral Small · Talent intelligence · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“GoPerfect ranks first because it is the only platform that covers sourcing, screening, and outreach autonomously in a single agent” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · first choice

“GoPerfect offers per-position pricing ($250/month per open role) that aligns costs with actual hiring activity” Llama 4 Maverick · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Value (Pay-Per-Use): GoPerfect ... widely considered the most efficient choice for startups.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GoPerfect, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoPerfect was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workable15 of 332Compare →

Pin13 of 335Not in the top three

Manatal10 of 333Compare →

Eightfold AI10 of 332Not in the top three

Greenhouse10 of 331Not in the top three

Lever8 of 331Not in the top three

SeekOut7 of 331Not in the top three

Gem6 of 331Not in the top three

hireEZ6 of 331Not in the top three

HireVue6 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoPerfect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 33 answers that named GoPerfect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goperfect.comYour site31

pin.com22

hiretruffle.com15

selectsoftwarereviews.com9

christianandtimbers.com8

thehirehub.ai8

chamberstalent.com7

greenhouse.com7

guideflow.com7

gomokka.com6

Eighty-nine of the 120 domain citations in answers naming GoPerfect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goperfect.com/blog/best-ai-recruitment-platforms-for-mid-sized-companies-in-202610

goperfect.com/blog/8-best-ai-recruiting-software-platforms-for-enterprise-teams-in-20269

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software9

goperfect.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-platforms-for-startups-on-a-budget-in-20268

pin.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-small-teams8

chamberstalent.com/blog/7-best-ai-recruiting-tools-for-small-businesses-in-20267

christianandtimbers.com/insights/top-ai-recruiting-software-pricing-2026-list-comparison7

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoPerfect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoPerfect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at goperfect.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.