AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Candidate assessment › Testlify vs CodeSignal
Candidate assessment · October 2026 Edition

Testlify vs CodeSignal

Zero of fourteen models named Testlify first on the direct prompt; zero named CodeSignal. Testlify was named by nine of the fourteen models and CodeSignal by eight and Testlify carries 12 labels and CodeSignal 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Testlify

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

CodeSignal

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1213A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Testlify reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.TestGorilla was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. TestGorilla vs Testlify · TestGorilla vs CodeSignal · Criteria Corp vs Testlify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the candidate assessment page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TestlifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCodeSignal
Direct00
Paraphrase01
Comparative00
Budget-constrained101 against Testlify · 1 against CodeSignal
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Testlify and CodeSignal stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Testlify CodeSignal first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Testlify on the left and CodeSignal on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Testlify and CodeSignal stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashTestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal, HireVue, Humantic AI
GLM 4.7 FlashXTestGorilla alternatives: Testlify, Vervoe

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniTestGorilla alternatives: Codility, HackerRank, Mercer | Mettl
Gemini 3.5 FlashTestGorilla alternatives: Criteria Corp, The Predictive Index, Vervoe
Perplexity SonarCriteria Corp alternatives: HireVue, TestGorilla, The Predictive Index
Grok 4.1 FastCriteria Corp alternatives: HireVue, TestGorilla, The Predictive Index
Mistral SmallCriteria Corp, Evalart alternatives: Adaface
DeepSeek V4 FlashCriteria Corp alternatives: TestGorilla, eSkill
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Criteria Corp alternatives: TestGorilla, The Predictive Index, Vervoe, Wonderlic
MiniMax M2.5Evalart, Toggl Hire
GPT-6 LunaCriteria Corp alternatives: TestGorilla
Muse Glimmer 30BCriteria Corp alternatives: Evalart

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CodeSignal leads by two points.
CodeSignal2%#– of 13
Testlify0%#7 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Testlify2%#4 of 12
CodeSignal2%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Testlify0%#– of 11
CodeSignal0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Testlify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“starts at $198/month, but a bit pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Testlify is the clearest pick from these results because it combines a very low entry price with a large test library” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about CodeSignal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“The best skills testing tool for hiring for a mid-sized B2B company would be CodeSignal, TestGorilla, or Criteria Corp.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.