AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Recruiting CRM › Pin vs Greenhouse
Recruiting CRM and sourcing · October 2026 Edition

Pin vs Greenhouse

Zero of fourteen models named Pin first on the direct prompt; zero named Greenhouse. Pin was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Greenhouse by nine and Pin carries 20 labels and Greenhouse 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pin

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

Greenhouse

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pin reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Gem was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Gem vs Pin · Gem vs Greenhouse · Lever vs Pin

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Recruiting CRM and sourcing page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PinFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGreenhouse
Direct00
Paraphrase02
Comparative10
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pin and Greenhouse stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pin Greenhouse first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pin on the left and Greenhouse on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pin and Greenhouse stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastLever alternatives: Gem, Greenhouse, Pin, Workable, hireEZ
Mistral SmallLever alternatives: Guideflow, Intervue, Pin
DeepSeek V4 FlashGem alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Workable
MiniMax M2.5Lever alternatives: Pin, Recruit CRM

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Gem, hireEZ
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Recruiter alternatives: Hiring Pro
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Juicebox, hireEZ
Perplexity SonarGem, hireEZ alternatives: Fetcher, Findem, SeekOut
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashGem alternatives: Apollo.io, SeekOut
Kimi K2Gem, hireEZ alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choice
GPT-6 LunaGem alternatives: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut
Muse Glimmer 30BLever alternatives: Gem, Workable, hireEZ

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pin leads by seventeen points.
Pin17%#2 of 12
Greenhouse0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Pin4%#6 of 10
Greenhouse4%#8 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Pin4%#– of 12
Greenhouse4%#8 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pin

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Greenhouse

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.