100Hires vs TalentLyft
Zero of twelve models named 100Hires first on the direct prompt; one named TalentLyft. 100Hires was named by eleven of the twelve models and TalentLyft by six and 100Hires carries 16 labels and TalentLyft 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
100HiresFirst choices, of twelve modelsTalentLyft
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, 100Hires and TalentLyft were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 62 answers naming 100Hires and the 31 naming TalentLyft. In those answers TalentLyft took the first choice two times and 100Hires two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
100Hires TalentLyft first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 100Hires on the left and TalentLyft on the right.The direct prompt
TalentLyft first, 100Hires not the choice
1 of 12 models100Hires was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
100Hires20%#1 of 16TalentLyft5%#7 of 16100Hires—not namedTalentLyft0%#– of 13What the models said about 100Hires
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“100Hires - Specifically designed for teams on tight budgets, offering job posting, email campaigns, and candidate tracking in a lean, easy-to-implement platform.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited budgets: Start with 100Hires at $49/month – it offers the most comprehensive feature set at the lowest price point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with 100Hires if you need to automate posting to social media to fill seats quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about TalentLyft
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“SMB options like TalentLyft (~$99/mo) exist but rank lower” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, TalentLyft or Workable offer the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“TalentLyft's free tier and Manatal's low starting price make them ideal starting points for companies with limited budgets” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“all-in-one recruiting + CRM/marketing suites for small-to-mid-size businesses” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.