Teamtailor vs 100Hires
One of twelve models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; zero named 100Hires. Teamtailor was named by ten of the twelve models and 100Hires by eleven and Teamtailor carries 24 labels and 100Hires 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
TeamtailorFirst choices, of twelve models100Hires
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Teamtailor and 100Hires were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 71 answers naming Teamtailor and the 62 naming 100Hires. In those answers 100Hires took the first choice five times and Teamtailor five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Teamtailor 100Hires first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamtailor on the left and 100Hires on the right.The direct prompt
Teamtailor first, 100Hires not the choice
1 of 12 models100Hires was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
100Hires20%#1 of 16Teamtailor11%#3 of 16Teamtailor16%#1 of 15100Hires6%#4 of 15Teamtailor0%#– of 13100Hires—not namedWhat the models said about Teamtailor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: ... Teamtailor (~$200+/month custom)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“G2's recent review summaries for Teamtailor, for example, mention support and functionality complaints alongside positives.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Moderate (not "avoid," but verify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Teamtailor if your priority is a modern, branded career site that also handles recruiting well” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Safer Bets: Stick to G2/Capterra leaders like Teamtailor (4.6/5), Bullhorn, or Joveo for proven track records” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“or Teamtailor if you want an all-in-one ATS + career site solution that's easy to implement and manage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about 100Hires
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“100Hires - Specifically designed for teams on tight budgets, offering job posting, email campaigns, and candidate tracking in a lean, easy-to-implement platform.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited budgets: Start with 100Hires at $49/month – it offers the most comprehensive feature set at the lowest price point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with 100Hires if you need to automate posting to social media to fill seats quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.