HR AI Index
Index Talent acquisition Recruitment marketing › Jobvite vs 100Hires
Recruitment marketing and career sites · September 2026 Edition

Jobvite vs 100Hires

Six of twelve models named Jobvite first on the direct prompt; zero named 100Hires. Jobvite was named by nine of the twelve models and 100Hires by eleven and both carry 16 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Jobvite

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

100Hires

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share14%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1616Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jobvite reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor vs Jobvite · Teamtailor vs 100Hires · Workable vs Jobvite

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
JobviteFirst choices, of twelve models100Hires
Direct60
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Jobvite
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jobvite and 100Hires stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Jobvite 100Hires first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jobvite on the left and 100Hires on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jobvite and 100Hires stood in it.

Jobvite first, 100Hires not the choice

6 of 12 models100Hires was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallJobvite alternatives: Joveo, Phenom, iCIMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashJobvite alternatives: Beamery, Phenom, Teamtailor, Workable
Llama 4 MaverickJobvite
Qwen 3.7 FlashJobvite alternatives: SmartDreamers, iCIMS
Kimi K2Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Beamery, Phenom
MiniMax M2.5Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Gem, Phenom, Teamtailor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Recruitee, TalentLyft

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5SmartDreamers alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobilla, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo
GPT-5.4 miniPhenom alternatives: Beamery, Joveo, Radancy
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Lever, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarPhenom alternatives: SmartDreamers, Teamtailor
GLM 4.7 FlashXTalentLyft, Workable alternatives: Recruitee

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
100Hires leads by twenty points.
100Hires20%#1 of 16
Jobvite0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Jobvite leads at mid-market.
Jobvite14%#3 of 15
100Hires6%#4 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
100Hires is not named for this buyer.
Jobvite2%#– of 13
100Hiresnot named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Jobvite

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Users highlight outdated UI, clunky reporting, high pricing, and migration pains” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Jobvite offers the most complete recruitment marketing suite tuned to your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend prioritizing Teamtailor, Jobvite, or similar mid-market focused suites.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Jobvite is widely considered the best all-around recruitment marketing platform.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about 100Hires

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“100Hires - Specifically designed for teams on tight budgets, offering job posting, email campaigns, and candidate tracking in a lean, easy-to-implement platform.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited budgets: Start with 100Hires at $49/month – it offers the most comprehensive feature set at the lowest price point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with 100Hires if you need to automate posting to social media to fill seats quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.