Every category where a model named 100Hires for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	6%	5 of 81	0%	16	accepted challenger
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	2%	16 of 88	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	2%	9 of 50	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	36 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 100Hires yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 100Hires across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	4	7
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels8

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels7

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“100Hires - Specifically designed for teams on tight budgets, offering job posting, email campaigns, and candidate tracking in a lean, easy-to-implement platform.” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“For most limited budgets: Start with 100Hires at $49/month – it offers the most comprehensive feature set at the lowest price point” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“Recommendation: Start with 100Hires if you need to automate posting to social media to fill seats quickly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“or 100Hires if you want strong automation without complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · Applicant tracking syste · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 100Hires, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 100Hires was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JazzHR32 of 623Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit27 of 627Not in the top three

Workable26 of 624Not in the top three

Manatal25 of 629Not in the top three

Breezy HR19 of 6210Not in the top three

Teamtailor18 of 625Not in the top three

Greenhouse15 of 620Not in the top three

LinkedIn Talent Solutions14 of 621Not in the top three

Phenom14 of 620Not in the top three

TalentLyft13 of 622Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 100Hires. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 62 answers that named 100Hires and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com48

learn.g2.com40

g2.com37

recruitcompare.io25

100hires.comYour site24

jugglehire.com24

getapp.com21

peoplemanagingpeople.com20

capterra.com18

pin.com14

247 of the 271 domain citations in answers naming 100Hires came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms38

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software31

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing/small-business25

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms24

getapp.com/all-software/recruitment-marketing-platforms/org/small-business20

jugglehire.com/blog/recruitment-software/recruitment-marketing-software20

g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-recruitment-marketing-software-for-smbs17

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 100Hires's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 100Hires, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 100hires.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.