Every category where a model named LinkedIn Talent Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	2%	14 of 81	30%	10	criticized challenger
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	66 of 109	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	70 of 77	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn Talent Solutions yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn Talent Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	2	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Free Tools Combo (LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Indeed)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“Allows for pay-as-you-go options, so you only pay for what you use, which can be cost-effective” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“Among the highest-rated platforms in the category with top recommendation scores” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“Pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing you to only spend when you need to.” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise Tools (like Eightfold or LinkedIn Talent Solutions) unless you are ready to commit to $25,000+ annual contracts” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid first if budget is tight: LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing or other ad-heavy platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · hard negative

“LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing is commonly described that way in recent user reviews: strong reach, but expensive and sometimes low on applicant quality.” GPT-5.4 mini · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

“Job scams appear on platforms like ZipRecruiter and LinkedIn, with scammers using complex schemes to lure job seekers into financial traps.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Talent Solutions, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Talent Solutions was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

100Hires14 of 357Not in the top three

JazzHR11 of 352Not in the top three

Workable11 of 351Not in the top three

Manatal10 of 353Not in the top three

Phenom10 of 350Not in the top three

Rally9 of 353Not in the top three

Beamery8 of 351Not in the top three

Teamtailor7 of 351Not in the top three

CareerArc7 of 350Not in the top three

Indeed7 of 350Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Talent Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named LinkedIn Talent Solutions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com24

learn.g2.com21

selectsoftwarereviews.com21

recruitcompare.io19

jugglehire.com13

joveo.com12

getapp.com9

pin.com8

hiretruffle.com6

herohunt.ai5

138 of the 138 domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Talent Solutions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms20

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software20

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms19

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing/small-business15

jugglehire.com/blog/recruitment-software/recruitment-marketing-software13

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms11

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing9

getapp.com/all-software/recruitment-marketing-platforms/org/small-business9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LinkedIn Talent Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.

LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing 3LinkedIn 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Talent Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedintalentsolutions.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.