HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Rally · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Rally

11Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Rally was named 7 times in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rally for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition4%8 of 810%7under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rally yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rally across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers free resources and community support, making it ideal for small teams on a tight budget. It’s often recommended as a starting point” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Rally - a free resource with a community.” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers free resources and community access, making it ideal for very small teams or startups.” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“look into Rally's free resources to build a company blog or culture page yourself” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rally, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rally was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LinkedIn Talent Solutions9 of 111Not in the top three
100Hires8 of 115Not in the top three
JuggleHire7 of 110Not in the top three
CareerArc6 of 110Not in the top three
Indeed5 of 111Not in the top three
JazzHR4 of 110Not in the top three
Glassdoor3 of 111Not in the top three
Workable3 of 110Not in the top three
Manatal2 of 111Not in the top three
Appcast2 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rally. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Rally and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jugglehire.com11
g2.com10
learn.g2.com9
recruitcompare.io8
selectsoftwarereviews.com7
getapp.com4
100hires.com3
joveo.com3
linkedin.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3

Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Rally came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rally's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rally, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rallyrecruitmentmarketing.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.