Every category where a model named JazzHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	3%	11 of 109	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	11 of 50	8%	26	accepted challenger
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	29 of 81	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	64 of 72	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JazzHR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JazzHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	3	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Kimi K2	1	1	1	2	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels3

Paraphrase28 labels9

Comparative30 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained35 labels3

Scale-constrained15 labelsNone

Negative19 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative145 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd lean toward Workable or JazzHR” Kimi K2 · Job advertising · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Another budget-friendly choice, especially for lean teams that want a straightforward setup and lower upfront costs” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Flat-Rate ATS (For Teams with Multiple Hiring Managers)... allows for unlimited users” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative

“Built specifically for small businesses ... but the cheapest plan omits some features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The user interface looks dated compared to modern tools like Ashby, and advanced integrations are sparse.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Applicant tracking syste · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Start at ~$75/month (JazzHR) — pricier, so only worth it if you also need applicant tracking” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · soft negative

“Cons: Can feel basic as hiring complexity grows” Kimi K2 · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · soft negative

“3-job cap on entry plan; overages add up fast” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JazzHR, over the 145 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JazzHR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Breezy HR78 of 14529Not in the top three

Workable75 of 14513Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit67 of 1457Not in the top three

Greenhouse50 of 1458Not in the top three

Manatal45 of 1458Not in the top three

Lever37 of 1450Not in the top three

100Hires32 of 1457Not in the top three

Teamtailor25 of 1456Not in the top three

BambooHR24 of 1453Not in the top three

Pinpoint16 of 1452Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JazzHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 129 of the 145 answers that named JazzHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com84

peoplemanagingpeople.com56

g2.com51

learn.g2.com45

capterra.com43

hiretruffle.com38

jugglehire.com37

pin.com33

100hires.com32

ventureharbour.com30

449 of the 449 domain citations in answers naming JazzHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms39

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems36

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing/small-business28

ventureharbour.com/applicant-tracking-systems28

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software27

capterra.com/resources/best-applicant-tracking-system26

zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems26

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-system-for-small-business25

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as JazzHR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JazzHR; a claim can dispute any of them.

JazzHR (Hero Plan) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JazzHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JazzHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jazzhr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.