Every category where a model named Pinpoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	4%	7 of 50	0%	24	accepted challenger
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	4%	10 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	33 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pinpoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pinpoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	2	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	3	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels4

Paraphrase12 labels2

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pinpoint ATS (Top Recommendation): Pinpoint is specifically designed for mid-market companies and features one of the most powerful built-in career site builders on the market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best All-Rounder for Mid-Market ... I'd recommend Pinpoint if employer branding and candidate experience are priorities” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Pinpoint - scores highest on the rubric for mid-market and enterprise organizations with powerful automation tools” Llama 4 Maverick · Applicant tracking syste · direct prompt · first choice

“Pinpoint and Greenhouse are often cited as the top choices” Mistral Small · Applicant tracking syste · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pinpoint, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pinpoint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenhouse39 of 4918Not in the top three

Workable30 of 493Not in the top three

Lever27 of 492Not in the top three

Ashby20 of 491Not in the top three

iCIMS18 of 492Not in the top three

JazzHR16 of 490Not in the top three

BambooHR13 of 490Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit12 of 490Not in the top three

Workday Recruiting11 of 493Not in the top three

Breezy HR10 of 491Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pinpoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 49 answers that named Pinpoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com31

pinpointhq.comYour site27

pin.com23

peoplemanagingpeople.com22

greenhouse.com16

zapier.com16

forbes.com14

darwinbox.com10

capterra.com8

leonar.app8

148 of the 175 domain citations in answers naming Pinpoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/applicant-tracking-systems29

pinpointhq.com/insights/best-applicant-tracking-system23

pin.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems21

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-applicant-tracking-systems19

zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems16

darwinbox.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems-enterprise10

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ats-software10

forbes.com/advisor/business/best-applicant-tracking-systems9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Pinpoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pinpoint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Pinpoint ATS 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pinpoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pinpoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pinpointhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.