Recruitment marketing and career sites · September 2026 Edition
Teamtailor vs Greenhouse
One of twelve models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; zero named Greenhouse. Teamtailor was named by ten of the twelve models and Greenhouse by eleven and Teamtailor carries 24 labels and Greenhouse 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
First-choice share16%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2417A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamtailor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Jobvite was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Teamtailor vs Workable · Teamtailor vs Jobvite · Teamtailor vs 100Hires
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamtailorFirst choices, of twelve modelsGreenhouse
Direct10
Paraphrase52
Comparative101 against Greenhouse
Budget-constrained101 against Teamtailor · 1 against Greenhouse
Scale-constrained10
Negative202 against Teamtailor · 1 against Greenhouse
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamtailor and Greenhouse stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Teamtailor Greenhouse first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamtailor on the left and Greenhouse on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamtailor and Greenhouse stood in it.
Teamtailor first, Greenhouse not the choice
1 of 12 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Grok 4.1 FastTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Recruitee, TalentLyft
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5SmartDreamers alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobilla, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Lever, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarPhenom alternatives: SmartDreamers, Teamtailor
DeepSeek V4 FlashJobvite alternatives: Beamery, Phenom, Teamtailor, Workable
MiniMax M2.5Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Gem, Phenom, Teamtailor
Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniPhenom alternatives: Beamery, Joveo, Radancy
Mistral SmallJobvite alternatives: Joveo, Phenom, iCIMS
Llama 4 MaverickJobvite
Qwen 3.7 FlashJobvite alternatives: SmartDreamers, iCIMS
Kimi K2Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Beamery, Phenom
GLM 4.7 FlashXTalentLyft, Workable alternatives: Recruitee
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamtailor leads by eleven points.
Teamtailor11%#3 of 16Greenhouse0%#12 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamtailor leads by twelve points.
Teamtailor16%#1 of 15Greenhouse4%#6 of 15Enterprise
The order flips: Greenhouse leads at enterprise.
Greenhouse8%#2 of 13Teamtailor0%#– of 13What the models said about Teamtailor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: ... Teamtailor (~$200+/month custom)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“G2's recent review summaries for Teamtailor, for example, mention support and functionality complaints alongside positives.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Moderate (not "avoid," but verify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Teamtailor if your priority is a modern, branded career site that also handles recruiting well” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Safer Bets: Stick to G2/Capterra leaders like Teamtailor (4.6/5), Bullhorn, or Joveo for proven track records” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“or Teamtailor if you want an all-in-one ATS + career site solution that's easy to implement and manage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“ATS-heavy tools (iCIMS, Greenhouse) are excellent at *storing/tracking* data but weaker at distributing your brand” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
Also compared
Teamtailor vs WorkableTeamtailor vs JobviteTeamtailor vs 100HiresTeamtailor vs PhenomTeamtailor vs TalentLyftTeamtailor vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsWorkable vs GreenhouseJobvite vs Greenhouse100Hires vs GreenhousePhenom vs GreenhouseGreenhouse vs TalentLyftGreenhouse vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full recruitment marketing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.