Recruitment marketing and career sites · September 2026 Edition
Greenhouse vs LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Zero of twelve models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; zero named LinkedIn Talent Solutions. Greenhouse was named by eleven of the twelve models and LinkedIn Talent Solutions by eight and Greenhouse carries 17 labels and LinkedIn Talent Solutions 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Greenhouse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Jobvite was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Teamtailor vs Greenhouse · Teamtailor vs LinkedIn Talent Solutions · Workable vs Greenhouse
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GreenhouseFirst choices, of twelve modelsLinkedIn Talent Solutions
Direct00
Paraphrase20
Comparative001 against Greenhouse
Budget-constrained011 against Greenhouse · 1 against LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Greenhouse · 2 against LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Greenhouse and LinkedIn Talent Solutions stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Greenhouse LinkedIn Talent Solutions first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and LinkedIn Talent Solutions on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Greenhouse and LinkedIn Talent Solutions stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5SmartDreamers alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobilla, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo
Neither was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniPhenom alternatives: Beamery, Joveo, Radancy
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Lever, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarPhenom alternatives: SmartDreamers, Teamtailor
Grok 4.1 FastTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Recruitee, TalentLyft
Mistral SmallJobvite alternatives: Joveo, Phenom, iCIMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashJobvite alternatives: Beamery, Phenom, Teamtailor, Workable
Llama 4 MaverickJobvite
Qwen 3.7 FlashJobvite alternatives: SmartDreamers, iCIMS
Kimi K2Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Beamery, Phenom
GLM 4.7 FlashXTalentLyft, Workable alternatives: Recruitee
MiniMax M2.5Jobvite, Workable alternatives: Gem, Phenom, Teamtailor
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Greenhouse0%#12 of 16LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%#10 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
Greenhouse leads by two points.
Greenhouse4%#6 of 15LinkedIn Talent Solutions2%#8 of 15Enterprise
Greenhouse leads by eight points.
Greenhouse8%#2 of 13LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%#– of 13What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“ATS-heavy tools (iCIMS, Greenhouse) are excellent at *storing/tracking* data but weaker at distributing your brand” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
What the models said about LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid first if budget is tight: LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing or other ad-heavy platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“LinkedIn Recruitment Marketing is commonly described that way in recent user reviews: strong reach, but expensive and sometimes low on applicant quality.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Job scams appear on platforms like ZipRecruiter and LinkedIn, with scammers using complex schemes to lure job seekers into financial traps.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: Free Tools Combo (LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Indeed)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Allows for pay-as-you-go options, so you only pay for what you use, which can be cost-effective” Mistral Small · budget prompt · alternative
“Among the highest-rated platforms in the category with top recommendation scores” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Teamtailor vs GreenhouseTeamtailor vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsWorkable vs GreenhouseWorkable vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsJobvite vs GreenhouseJobvite vs LinkedIn Talent Solutions100Hires vs Greenhouse100Hires vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsPhenom vs GreenhousePhenom vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsGreenhouse vs TalentLyftTalentLyft vs LinkedIn Talent SolutionsAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full recruitment marketing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.